logo Sign In

That guy with no name

User Group
Members
Join date
28-Dec-2020
Last activity
4-Nov-2025
Posts
1,061
Web Site
https://www.youtube.com/@TGWNN.

Post History

Post
#1666717
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

roy neary said:

It looks like the font has changed on the ALI versions in that it’s regular, vs bold on the 4k77.

It’s not. It’s the exact same font. It’s just that 4K77 has brighter highlights Which gives the illusion of a different font. But it’s the same font and even fades in and out at the exact same time.

Post
#1666685
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

YAREL_RGP said:

oojason said:

NEW SCREENSHOT COMPARISON - AND A NEW VIDEO CLIP - FROM RETURN OF THE JEDI

 

ALI…

 
UHD…

 
2011 blu ray…

 
4K83…

 

a streamable video clip of the above scene: https://streamable.com/q1txlq
 

I still find it strange that the VistaVision intermediate film hasn’t been scanned at 8K. I don’t know if 6K is really that good, because even though VistaVision is high quality, how comparable is it to a 65mm film to warrant scanning it at 8K?

I’m not sure why you’re mentioning Vistavision, as only a handful of shots were printed on that stock. The reason this shot is labeled as such is most likely a typo, as the last ROTJ shot (palace door matte) was a VVI, and that has been carried into the title of this new clip. Either way, according to the docs, all effects shots are, in fact, being scanned in 8K. This shot, which isn’t a VVI, was most likely scanned at 6K. At least according to the documents.

Post
#1666643
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

I have no clue what source you’re using, but it’s completely wrong.

Here’s the UHD with HDR simulation:

And here’s the SDR 1080p BD:

And here’s yours:

I haven’t got a clue where you’ve sourced your screencap from, but it doesn’t look like the UDH. Not even close. Please check your sources before correcting people in the future.

Post
#1666610
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

Little Nemo said:

I know screencaps are an imperfect science (I also think I’m a frame off) but when I try I get this:

UHD

vs. the above

…which feels like it’s had some of the blue sucked out and highlights surpressed

What source are you using for the UHD? And what HDR to SDR converter?

Post
#1666464
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

timdiggerm said:

That guy with no name said:

timdiggerm said:

I had missed that redacted pastebin partial. Any idea what the .WI source is? The others all make sense.

very interesting that they’ve partially re-recorded foley for the new 7.1 mix. That’s…well, maybe it’s understandable, but it’s surprising nonetheless.

VVI stands for Vista Vision Intermediate or Interpositive. This has been confirmed by the clips that have been named as such…

Ooooooh that makes so much sense. Thank you.

Yeah. For Star Wars 77 those shots would be limited to the many space or model ship shots…

Post
#1666457
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

timdiggerm said:

I had missed that redacted pastebin partial. Any idea what the .WI source is? The others all make sense.

very interesting that they’ve partially re-recorded foley for the new 7.1 mix. That’s…well, maybe it’s understandable, but it’s surprising nonetheless.

VVI stands for Vista Vision Intermediate or Interpositive. This has been confirmed by the clips that have been named as such…

Post
#1666439
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

see you auntie said:

I only found out about this leak today, for the last 10 years I’ve been on and off read-only here on ot.com and similar at the 4K77/80/83 forums. Reading between the lines, that’s where originally there was a discussion thread on the ALI leak what was made private for reasons I completely understand.

The reason I bring this up because there’s obviously 3+ months of discussion I’m not privy to but I wanted to ask if there’s a theory as to the framing/cropping ALI is using for all 3 films?

I realise it’s a WIP but looking at the comparisons provided by oojason, the framing is different from the ALI restoration and 4K77/80/83 (ignoring the UHD and Blu-ray)

In one of the documents there is mention of a published cropping standard for all three films Which is apparently being used. ROTJ seems to have the widest cropping; seeming to be even wider than the official release, though ESB and ANH are much, much more tight. From what we can tell the final cropping will most likely be different.

Post
#1666310
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

NewCanaanite said:

Apologies if this has been addressed , but do we have any evidence (like a screenshot) that this is a restoration of the theatrical versions (or at least something pre-19967)? Is it possible this will just be the same edit as what is on disney+?

Yes. We’ve seen original model shots, matte paintings, and even the original Sy Snootles puppet…

Post
#1665923
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

Fang Zei said:

timdiggerm said:

I also wonder if they won’t do a purist version (original effects) and a nicer-looking version (original but recomposited effects), with the latter being what gets released in theaters.

I would hope they leave it alone completely.

There’s no reason for a nicer-looking version when the SE exists. If we want to keep any fixes while getting rid of what we don’t like, well, that’s what places like this are for.

Historical preservation would be my priority. That’s why it kinda bothers me that they’re apparently doing a 7.1 remix with alternate takes and whatnot. If that was only being done for the latest SE I wouldn’t care, but if that’s what would be heard in a dcp of the “unaltered” version then we’re getting into revisionism territory.

They’re fully restoring both the stereo and mono mixes. And maybe the 70mm mix too. The 7.1 DTS will probably be for theatres, as there is no evidence that it will be included on home media. What we do know is that they aren’t just remixing from the stems but going back to the raw elements…

Post
#1665895
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

johnsmith01 said:

That guy with no name said:

johnsmith01 said:

The truth is that because of security and legal reasons the truth about this is not able to be told just yet. You only see what they want you to see.

You’re a liar. Hey! Stop lying. You don’t know anything.

I know about the slugs and only 3 people on here do including me. If you do not know about the slugs then you know little.

The what? Are you just screwing with us know?
Stop lying, stop scrounging for attention. Also by those 2 other people do you mean just YOU?

Post
#1665885
Topic
⭐ Star Wars' <strong>50th anniversary</strong> in 2027 ⭐ | Your hopes and expectations <em>(if any)</em>...
Time

Do7Rep said:

Do7 have gave permission to reveal some details. Important thing to remember is this is all real and is happening but we need to have faith and remember things might not make sense at first. When it is all said and done only then will you know why we had to do what we had to do.

We thought project text would keep everybody busy while we worked behind the scenes and not get any lawyers onto us. No the text is not real and is not the real work being done for the restoration. Do7 agreed to mislead for security so the trail won’t lead back to us it is for security in case Disney got on our backs. It was done for fun too for fans to figure out like a puzzle but we cannot reveal more until the time is right.

The original theatrical cuts of the original trilogy will be seen in highest quality imaginable very soon. Some of us seen a lot more than the leaks and teases and it will all be worth it because it is beautiful.

This guy is complete BS. I have been following this leak since the beginning. In fact, I discovered it! (I am Member X) I have no clue what the hell “Do7” is, but this guy, whoever he is, has no connection to the proposed restoration team (ALI). The Pastebin Texts (if that’s what he’s referring to) are in fact real for the most part, there are some clear inaccuracies Which we, on the other forum, have concluded is due to AI being involved in this whole ordeal, not the actual restoration mind you, but the uploading to YouTube and pastebin deal. Please disregard this person and his sock here and I call on the mods to take action against this troll who is spreading BS and wants attention. Please just ignore him and take everything he says with a grain of salt.

I’ve been weary to reveal my position in this, but now that the cat is out of the bag, there’s no point.
I will answer all the questions I possibly can, Please don’t PM me concerning this.

Post
#1664759
Topic
STAR WARS: EP IV 2004 <strong>REVISITED</strong> ADYWAN *<em>1080p HD VERSION NOW IN PRODUCTION</em>
Time

O00ll00O said:

Hey Ady, in relation to your “red leader trench run” video

@ 1:04 Vader is doing the trench run. When it cut to inside his cockpit, the background shows him still in space and flying downward. He should have the trench run in the window behind him. This happens again @ 1:18

That’s a top window. The shot’s pov is from below. There are supposed to be stars there.

Post
#1661788
Topic
Original trilogy: Special Edition 1997 restoration | AVAILABLE AGAIN STARTING FROM 17 SEPTEMBER
Time

Roobyoo said:

Director said:

I will soon give some screenshots.

Director said:

…, so I will absolutely be uploading a video preview this month!

Director said:

I will do a reel sample video showcasing the scenes on YouTube within 9-12 September.

Let’s be fair… He said sept 9 - 12. 3 more days to go! Im excited!

Post
#1661669
Topic
Star Wars Deleted Scenes Restored (a WIP)
Time

Sky_ said:

Need someone who can help me with color correcting on a deleted sequence. Please

Im kinda stuck… I mean its looks okay here as I did it in Photoshop, but it doesn’t look right in the video, as every cut looks different and just doesn’t look right, need major help. Plus, ill put your name in the Video as a THANK YOU 😃

alt text

I may be able to help. PM me if you’d like.

Post
#1660655
Topic
Star Wars Deleted Scenes Restored (a WIP)
Time

Sky_ said:

This is the first deleted EXTENDED scene from Star Wars, showing a young Luke Skywalker tending to a moisture vaporator before setting off for Tosche Station. PART 1 of 2
Thanks to

benduwan:

for supplying me with the Radio Drama, that was used for the first part of the Video

VIDEO LINK BELOW**
https://youtu.be/VtxV0oVh5h8

alt text

Looks incredible.

Post
#1660017
Topic
STAR WARS: EP VI -RETURN OF THE JEDI &quot;REVISITED EDITION&quot;<strong>ADYWAN</strong> - ** PRODUCTION HAS NOW RESTARTED **
Time

ThiscouldbeR2D2 said:

Matt.F said:

exitzero said:

Any deleted scenes you want to use for fan edit but the quality was lacking, may not be off the table-

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UlqN4h40dt8

I really hope that the deleted scene with Vader telepathically reaching out to Luke in the cave at the start of the film could be restored and reinserted into ROTJ:Revisited. It’s a scene that should never have been cut.

I think that scene recontextualises the whole movie for the better, it adds some depth and gravitas (which the film could do with to be honest), it rightfully places the Father/Son relationship front and centre, and makes the final act even more epic and impactful.

It’s certainly better condition footage than the deleted scene linked above with Luke using his binoculars, that one was far rougher. It would be quite a coup if the Vader and Luke scene could be sufficiently restored to add back in to Revisited, and for me it would be the single biggest improvement that could be made to ROTJ.

Sorry, but it’s not being included. In fact, Adywan retimed the shot with the wipe transition to R2 and 3PO so that there is no more of that slowdown that was added to make up for the removal of the scene.

He also said that scene was unusable due to its quality.

Post
#1659724
Topic
Does the 2K scan of Star wars from 1997 still exist?
Time

JadedSkywalker said:

They were meant for DVD. Why Lucas thought they were good enough for Blu-Ray, I really have no explanation. Not to mention further changes. And fixes.

Just to think even the 2020 UHD only happened because of the 3D release that was cancelled and those scans.

We had the same HD master on DVD, HDTV, and Blu-Ray for what 15 or 16 years.

John Lowry literally said that when the Blu-Rays would come out, Lucas would most likely come back for a better restoration… That never happened.

Post
#1659695
Topic
Does the 2K scan of Star wars from 1997 still exist?
Time

Anakin94 said:

YAREL_RGP said:
There is no 2K scan of the special edition trilogy, the restoration was all analog and physical,

And how the 2004 SE was made?
AFAIK it’s based on the 1997 SE 2k scan.

The 2004 scans were done in HD 1920x1080p 16-bit color. They were completed with only DVD mastering in mind, that’s why they are such bad quality.